Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Greg Hunter's avatar

What I found in most communities is that the City Council is controlled by representatives of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. In Laramie that is not the case and that is a good thing as those governments do not represent the people but their benefactors.

What I find interesting is the lack of discussion about the power of the insurance industry to force landlords to do what is right by their tenets. I was an insurance inspector for a time until I got tired of being the "dick of Wyoming" by telling business owners/landlords that were going to lose their insurance if they did not fix the issues I identified during the inspection.

For instance there is no law that prevents wood burning fireplaces in homes or businesses but almost every property that had one of these existing units would be either get rid of the fireplace or pay a hefty premium to keep one. There were also show stoppers associated with electrical systems, functioning smoke detectors and many other requirements designed to prevent payouts on poorly located or maintained properties.

It seems pretty clear to me that the insurance industry will place far more burdens with far greater leverage than the city ordinance, but complying with these requirements may help reduce the landlord's insurance costs.

And maybe that is what the City Council should do is contact the major property insurers and see if the landlords could get an insurance break if the landlord registered their properties and complied with basic requirements that the city asks for?

Expand full comment
Brett Glass's avatar

As usual, blogger Jeff Victor has cherry picked portions of my testimony before the Committee rather than linking to the actual source material. For full, unredacted video of the discussion, see https://youtu.be/c8Dx_8TH5W8?t=5886.

In the disucussion before the Committee, citizens were outnumbered by bureaucrats, who made a number of very misleading statements. There was also behind-the-scenes lobbying by WAM (the Wyoming Association of Municipalities), which constantly lobbies for more power for municipal governments.

In any event, the bill was eventually voted down. What the legislators who voted against it said - loudly and clearly - is that they believe very strongly in the concept of "local control." As they remarked to me after the vote, they will gladly give us enough rope to hang ourselves. If we in Laramie want to strangle our local economy, harm business development, make housing unaffordable and unavailable, or create an overbearing, overreaching bureaucracy, they will let us do that and learn from our mistakes.

And we are already starting to learn.

Rentals are already in short supply, and rents are already skyrocketing. Tenants are discovering (as shown by public records) that even if they complain to the City about a problem with a rental, they still must go to Small Claims Court (which costs only $10) or Circuit Court (a whopping $35, but it can do more for you) to enforce their rights. Fortunately for them, that's easier to do than to deal with the City.

One of my goals should I be elected to Council (despite Jeff's efforts to campaign against me in this blog) will be to increase the supply of workforce and affordable housing without compromising on quality, safety., or enforcement of tenants' rights. As a landlord, a tenant, AND a longtime resident of Laramie who wants to see it prosper, I see this as vital to our community's future.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts