2 Comments

You know, a person could read your article and never know that the vast majority of public comment voiced opposition to the ad hoc working group. A reader would also have no idea that those opposed to the ad hoc working group claimed to have gathered over 1000 signatures on a petition expressing that opposition. Readers would also be ignorant of the fact that public comment criticized the effort to silence that opposition.

If you’re going to claim to be the Laramie Reporter, shouldn’t you at least make some effort at impartiality?

Expand full comment